Fighting for America

Efforts to revive the Iran Nuclear Deal risk empowering a regime whose stated goals and actions undermine U.S. interests, Middle East stability, and the security of our allies. Our position has consistently emphasized resisting policies that would enable Iran’s nuclear ambitions while continuing to champion successful initiatives such as the Abraham Accords and strong support for Israel. Our advocacy has contributed to maintaining pressure on malign actors and reinforcing regional partnerships. 

China continues to pose one of the most significant external challenges to U.S. security and global stability. Engagement strategies that strengthen the Chinese Communist Party’s geopolitical ambitions risk accelerating their military, economic, technological, and political influence. Our work emphasizes the need for firm, principled policy—including sanctions, restrictions, and countermeasures—to protect American interests and curb malign expansion. 

Border security is fundamental to national sovereignty and public safety. While recent policy shifts have produced improvement in key areas, our earlier efforts helped highlight vulnerabilities and mobilized broader support for stronger border measures. As progress continues, we are now able to direct greater attention toward emerging challenges while remaining vigilant in this foundational area. 

Policy choices that hinder domestic energy production—such as halting the Keystone Pipeline—carry significant national-security and economic consequences. We believe U.S. energy independence strengthens our geopolitical posture and supports American workers. Our work continues to highlight the strategic necessity of reliable, domestic energy pathways. 

A healthy republic relies on open discourse and an environment where ideas can be exchanged freely. Government-driven censorship, coordinated suppression, distortion of speech, or misuse of digital platforms threaten this foundation. We support policies that safeguard transparency, preserve open expression, and ensure accountability—including a critical reassessment of Section 230 and the role of major technology platforms in shaping public debate. 

The strength of the U.S. Armed Forces depends on a clear focus on readiness, cohesion, and war-fighting capability. Deploying service members for political imagery or prioritizing divisive ideological programming detracts from these core missions. We advocate for policies that support service members and veterans, reinforce war-fighting excellence, and maintain the unity essential to military success.